Bringing an smg and large auths to the city because you want to watch one of your own characters and you're 'bored'What, this is absurd
please explain how you managed to arrive at the city through the canals plz they are closed off if you have actually botthered to look in the map
Feel free to call me out on this but I'm fairly sure this char going to the city to watch out for another one of your chars breaks the interaction rule. However I think the char in the city belongs to Elions? Not too sure on this. [/quoteThe character Layla is going to look for / protect is Joanna 'Tragedy' Sinbow, a character of Elions. There's no infringement of the interaction rule taking place here, trust me.
As far as 'high profile' activities go, I have no interest in them. In fact, I'd be quite fine with my inventory being wiped before I entered the city, of course, pending that I get them back on my return to Outlands. I have no interest in stirring up the hive during my stay.
You can RP and not have to use your extremely OP characters.Tl;Dr step away from your OP chars for a bit while your waiting and just make a char on City.
And also, if you were to die/be caught in the City, you won't be able to just return to Outlands, so there's always that risk.
I was trying to demonstrate that I have little intent to use the weapons within the city. If having them removed temporarily is an issue, then I could keep them during my stay: all the same, I intend to still be armed when I return to Outlands.
Characters are only as 'Over-Powered' as their OOC players use them. Layla's unique blend of skills definately grant her a abilities and venues of 'attack' that others don't have, but to say that they character is OP, I'd say that you have to cite events or examples of situations where I have abused the character's auths for personal gain.Tl;DR? I'll shorten it up: Don't try to pursue a smear campaign against a character unless you fully intend to back it up properly.
What you're essentially telling me is that no matter what we say, you'll be armed. Is this assumption correct?
Quote from: alexanderk on January 19, 2013, 12:37:00 PMWhat you're essentially telling me is that no matter what we say, you'll be armed. Is this assumption correct?What I mean is, it doesn't matter whether I'm armed in the city or not, but it would be far preferable to be armed when I'm in the Outlands again. Whether that means ICly leaving the weapons behind, taking them with me, or ICly ignoring the firearm angle all together, it matters little to me within the city.